Tools & Wizards About Us
lufo.ro screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

lufo.ro

Colegiul National Unirea Focsani

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

892 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

329 ms

lufo.ro screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lufo content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lufo.ro

Colegiul Naţional Unirea Focsani

Visit lufo.ro

Key Findings

We analyzed Lufo.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 892 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lufo.ro performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lufo.ro

892 ms

mootools.js

544 ms

caption.js

271 ms

system.css

297 ms

general.css

295 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Lufo.ro, 26% (11 requests) were made to Static.matterport.com and 2% (1 request) were made to My.matterport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Lufo.ro.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lufo.ro main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 823.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 127.1 kB

  • Original 596.2 kB
  • After minification 469.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lufo needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 108.5 kB

  • Original 823.5 kB
  • After minification 821.0 kB
  • After compression 715.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 79.1 kB
  • After compression 52.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lufo.ro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (69%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lufo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lufo.ro

lufo.ro

892 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

544 ms

caption.js

caption.js

271 ms

system.css

system.css

297 ms

general.css

general.css

295 ms

template.css

template.css

579 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

575 ms

script.js

script.js

407 ms

121 ms

Bottom_texture.jpg

Bottom_texture.jpg

579 ms

page_gl.png

page_gl.png

283 ms

sheet_s.png

sheet_s.png

146 ms

sheet_h.png

sheet_h.png

139 ms

sheet_v.png

sheet_v.png

139 ms

sheet_c.png

sheet_c.png

145 ms

nav.png

nav.png

272 ms

menuitem.png

menuitem.png

274 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

291 ms

subitem.png

subitem.png

290 ms

header.png

header.png

1211 ms

sidebar_bg.png

sidebar_bg.png

416 ms

blockheader.png

blockheader.png

424 ms

blockcontent_s.png

blockcontent_s.png

430 ms

blockcontent_h.png

blockcontent_h.png

430 ms

blockcontent_v.png

blockcontent_v.png

550 ms

blockcontentbullets.png

blockcontentbullets.png

565 ms

sigla_150.jpg

sigla_150.jpg

5497 ms

prof_logo.png

prof_logo.png

713 ms

footer_s.png

footer_s.png

653 ms

footer_b.png

footer_b.png

673 ms

menuseparator.png

menuseparator.png

687 ms

showcase.css

showcase.css

63 ms

unsupported_browser.css

unsupported_browser.css

76 ms

three.min.js

three.min.js

129 ms

browser-check.js

browser-check.js

104 ms

showcase.js

showcase.js

188 ms

roboto-regular.woff

roboto-regular.woff

19 ms

roboto-500.woff

roboto-500.woff

39 ms

roboto-300.woff

roboto-300.woff

34 ms

roboto-100.woff

roboto-100.woff

38 ms

roboto-700.woff

roboto-700.woff

44 ms

roboto-900.woff

roboto-900.woff

55 ms

Accessibility Review

lufo.ro accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lufo.ro best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lufo.ro SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RO

  • Language Claimed

    RO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lufo.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lufo.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lufo.ro

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lufo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: