4.1 sec in total
883 ms
1.7 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Lulobyte content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lulobyte.com
SEX大好きな男女が集まるセフレ掲示板を発見!Hが好きな人に絶対おすすめの情報あります!
Visit lulobyte.comWe analyzed Lulobyte.com page load time and found that the first response time was 883 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lulobyte.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value4.3 s
41/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.066
97/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
883 ms
56 ms
83 ms
87 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Lulobyte.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) belongs to the original domain Lulobyte.com.
Page size can be reduced by 241.4 kB (74%)
328.3 kB
86.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lulobyte.com main page is 328.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 170.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lulobyte images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lulobyte.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (57%)
23
10
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lulobyte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lulobyte.com
883 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
56 ms
style.css
83 ms
elegantfont.css
87 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.js
121 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
platform.js
70 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
77 ms
infinitescroll-settings.js
81 ms
placeholders.js
108 ms
scroll-to-top.js
257 ms
menubox.js
261 ms
selectnav.js
261 ms
responsive.js
262 ms
wp-embed.min.js
263 ms
sdk.js
141 ms
widgets.js
399 ms
pattern.png
343 ms
ajax-loader.gif
344 ms
512 ms
qhFtudkoEdJV__ba4WegbA.ttf
330 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
332 ms
173 ms
xd_arbiter.php
73 ms
xd_arbiter.php
91 ms
lulobyte.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lulobyte.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lulobyte.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lulobyte.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Lulobyte.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lulobyte.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lulobyte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: