Tools & Wizards About Us
lum-search.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

lum-search.net

DIALux Luminaire Finder - Search luminaire

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

288 ms

lum-search.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lum Search content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lum-search.net

DIALux Luminaire Finder is the luminaire search engine from DIAL. Anyone- whether professional light planners, architects, interior designers or private users “ will be able to search for and find sui...

Visit lum-search.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lum-search.net page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lum-search.net performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

en

204 ms

main.css

95 ms

lumsearchapp.min.js

370 ms

common.js

190 ms

searchentry-functions.js

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lum-search.net, 26% (6 requests) were made to Adserver.lumsearch.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.dial.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Lumsearch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

827.6 kB

After Optimization

733.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lum-search.net main page is 827.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 718.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 54.7 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 718.1 kB
  • After minification 704.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lum Search images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (38%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lum Search. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

en

en

204 ms

main.css

main.css

95 ms

lumsearchapp.min.js

lumsearchapp.min.js

370 ms

common.js

common.js

190 ms

searchentry-functions.js

searchentry-functions.js

189 ms

searchentry.js

searchentry.js

191 ms

handlebars.runtime.min.js

handlebars.runtime.min.js

189 ms

handlebars.js

handlebars.js

190 ms

22733c92-ae03-4051-89ef-a1884337af4b.jpg

22733c92-ae03-4051-89ef-a1884337af4b.jpg

851 ms

LUMsearch_logo.png

LUMsearch_logo.png

96 ms

icons-sdd56eb0bba.png

icons-sdd56eb0bba.png

96 ms

start-s9cf568d005.png

start-s9cf568d005.png

195 ms

d574e1e2-99aa-416d-ad06-70f7d792f221.jpg

d574e1e2-99aa-416d-ad06-70f7d792f221.jpg

130 ms

33cdbc73-c3db-48c6-97ed-1a38d355afe7.jpg

33cdbc73-c3db-48c6-97ed-1a38d355afe7.jpg

218 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

350 ms

ajs.php

ajs.php

243 ms

ajs.php

ajs.php

239 ms

a140

a140

140 ms

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

419 ms

03a5663e8689d27f7fea430087012ff9.jpg

03a5663e8689d27f7fea430087012ff9.jpg

202 ms

lg.php

lg.php

115 ms

32f7408d4b8c7a804270d6a661d78ebe.jpg

32f7408d4b8c7a804270d6a661d78ebe.jpg

402 ms

lg.php

lg.php

215 ms

Accessibility Review

lum-search.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

lum-search.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lum-search.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lum-search.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lum-search.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lum-search.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lum Search. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: