5.5 sec in total
658 ms
4.6 sec
181 ms
Welcome to sp.livecontent.pro homepage info - get ready to check Sp Livecontent best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about sp.livecontent.pro
Visit sp.livecontent.proWe analyzed Sp.livecontent.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sp.livecontent.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
658 ms
3919 ms
6 ms
4 ms
466 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Sp.livecontent.pro, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Vk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 676.2 kB (67%)
1.0 MB
328.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sp.livecontent.pro main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 461.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sp Livecontent needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 177.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 402.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sp.livecontent.pro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 402.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)
39
7
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sp Livecontent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sp.livecontent.pro
658 ms
rtrg
3919 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
watch.js
4 ms
common_gcs.js
466 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
272 ms
wp.css
273 ms
style.min.css
490 ms
default.min.css
2457 ms
jquery.js
608 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
312 ms
jquery.noconflict.min.js
360 ms
jquery.loadScript.min.js
360 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
96 ms
css
27 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
323 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.min.js
444 ms
popup.min.js
354 ms
validation.min.js
436 ms
comment-reply.min.js
444 ms
menus.min.js
474 ms
tooltipster.min.js
657 ms
selectnav.min.js
533 ms
dropkick.min.js
636 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
567 ms
jquery.sharrre-1.3.4.min.js
611 ms
jquery.reveal.min.js
636 ms
countdown.min.js
660 ms
global.min.js
713 ms
ga-audiences
44 ms
2015-04-07_16-22-44-1.png
626 ms
counter
145 ms
rtrg
2174 ms
rtrg
2279 ms
fbevents.js
41 ms
code.js
322 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
430 ms
30 ms
counter
152 ms
2015-04-28_23-43-40.png
901 ms
one-red-aroow.png
331 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
60 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
60 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
61 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
61 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
progressbar-gradient.png
93 ms
tracker
154 ms
sp.livecontent.pro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
sp.livecontent.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
sp.livecontent.pro SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sp.livecontent.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Sp.livecontent.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sp.livecontent.pro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sp Livecontent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: