Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

studiocoverage.livejournal.com

studiocoverage — LiveJournal

Page Load Speed

26.9 sec in total

First Response

934 ms

Resources Loaded

25 sec

Page Rendered

999 ms

studiocoverage.livejournal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to studiocoverage.livejournal.com homepage info - get ready to check Studiocoverage Live Journal best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about studiocoverage.livejournal.com

Visit studiocoverage.livejournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiocoverage.livejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 934 ms and then it took 26 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

studiocoverage.livejournal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

studiocoverage.livejournal.com

934 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

17 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

28 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

23 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 193 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Studiocoverage.livejournal.com, 9% (17 requests) were made to L-stat.livejournal.net and 6% (12 requests) were made to Cdn.doubleverify.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Imrk.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 415.6 kB (69%)

Content Size

604.6 kB

After Optimization

189.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Studiocoverage.livejournal.com main page is 604.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 339.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 179.1 kB

  • Original 250.2 kB
  • After minification 231.8 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 449 B

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiocoverage Live Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 236.0 kB

  • Original 339.5 kB
  • After minification 300.9 kB
  • After compression 103.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 145 (86%)

Requests Now

169

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 169 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiocoverage Live Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

studiocoverage.livejournal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiocoverage.livejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiocoverage.livejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studiocoverage Live Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: