Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

theeverydayman.livejournal.com

The Everyday Man — LiveJournal

Page Load Speed

30.1 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

26.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

theeverydayman.livejournal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing The Everyday Man Live Journal content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about theeverydayman.livejournal.com

Life Through the Eyes of an Everyday Man...

Visit theeverydayman.livejournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Theeverydayman.livejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 29.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

theeverydayman.livejournal.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,670 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.328

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

theeverydayman.livejournal.com

1054 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

63 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

82 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

75 ms

l-stat.livejournal.net

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 211 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Theeverydayman.livejournal.com, 18% (37 requests) were made to Ic.pics.livejournal.com and 9% (19 requests) were made to L-stat.livejournal.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Imrk.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 484.4 kB (57%)

Content Size

850.6 kB

After Optimization

366.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Theeverydayman.livejournal.com main page is 850.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 416.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 179.9 kB

  • Original 252.0 kB
  • After minification 234.1 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 182.4 kB
  • After minification 154.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Everyday Man Live Journal needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 276.9 kB

  • Original 416.2 kB
  • After minification 377.3 kB
  • After compression 139.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (55%)

Requests Now

176

After Optimization

79

The browser has sent 176 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Everyday Man Live Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

theeverydayman.livejournal.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

theeverydayman.livejournal.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

theeverydayman.livejournal.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theeverydayman.livejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theeverydayman.livejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Everyday Man Live Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: