2.2 sec in total
256 ms
1.8 sec
140 ms
Click here to check amazing Archive Monthly Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about archive.monthlyreview.org
An independent socialist magazine founded in 1949
Visit archive.monthlyreview.orgWe analyzed Archive.monthlyreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
archive.monthlyreview.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
256 ms
95 ms
191 ms
188 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Archive.monthlyreview.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (653 ms) belongs to the original domain Archive.monthlyreview.org.
Page size can be reduced by 63.5 kB (30%)
210.5 kB
147.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Archive.monthlyreview.org main page is 210.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 139.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Archive Monthly Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (83%)
46
8
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archive Monthly Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mr
256 ms
pkp.css
95 ms
common.css
191 ms
common.css
188 ms
compiled.css
194 ms
jsapi
19 ms
sidebar.css
189 ms
rightSidebar.css
190 ms
classicRed.css
199 ms
journalStyleSheet.css
278 ms
jquery.tag-it.js
278 ms
jquery.cookie.js
278 ms
fontController.js
279 ms
general.js
280 ms
jqueryValidatorI18n.js
295 ms
Helper.js
371 ms
ObjectProxy.js
371 ms
Handler.js
377 ms
LinkActionRequest.js
371 ms
Feature.js
374 ms
SiteHandler.js
396 ms
UrlInDivHandler.js
461 ms
AutocompleteHandler.js
462 ms
ExtrasOnDemandHandler.js
463 ms
FormHandler.js
464 ms
AjaxFormHandler.js
465 ms
ClientFormHandler.js
492 ms
GridHandler.js
557 ms
LinkActionHandler.js
556 ms
SearchFormHandler.js
555 ms
ReportGeneratorFormHandler.js
558 ms
LuceneAutocompleteHandler.js
559 ms
jquery.pkp.js
592 ms
jquery.validate.js
653 ms
jqueryUi.css
568 ms
jquery.pnotify.default.css
567 ms
pnotify.css
479 ms
notificationIcons.css
480 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
46 ms
mr-archive-header.png
96 ms
cover_issue_848_en_US.jpg
461 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
font-down.png
94 ms
font-default.png
93 ms
font-up.png
94 ms
collect
16 ms
archive.monthlyreview.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
archive.monthlyreview.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
archive.monthlyreview.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archive.monthlyreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Archive.monthlyreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archive.monthlyreview.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archive Monthly Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: