2.7 sec in total
328 ms
1.9 sec
459 ms
Welcome to blog.metaseq.net homepage info - get ready to check Blog Metaseq best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about blog.metaseq.net
Visit blog.metaseq.netWe analyzed Blog.metaseq.net page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
blog.metaseq.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value2.5 s
89/100
25%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
328 ms
49 ms
43 ms
88 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.metaseq.net, 22% (21 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Alexgorbatchev.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 228.1 kB (46%)
491.2 kB
263.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.metaseq.net main page is 491.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 164.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 543 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Metaseq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.metaseq.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (57%)
84
36
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Metaseq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.metaseq.net
328 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
49 ms
gsearch.css
43 ms
authorization.css
88 ms
shCore.css
151 ms
shThemeDefault.css
148 ms
shCore.js
150 ms
shBrushCpp.js
151 ms
shBrushCss.js
150 ms
shBrushJScript.js
150 ms
shBrushPlain.js
213 ms
shBrushPython.js
214 ms
shBrushXml.js
214 ms
plusone.js
96 ms
widgets.js
24 ms
bookmark_button.js
562 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
38 ms
jsapi
40 ms
shThemeDefault.css
178 ms
shCore.js
13 ms
shCore.css
163 ms
shBrushCpp.js
20 ms
shBrushCss.js
21 ms
shBrushJScript.js
14 ms
shBrushPlain.js
4 ms
shBrushPython.js
4 ms
shBrushXml.js
4 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
7 ms
cornell_bear.jpg
237 ms
uv_tutorial.png
525 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
6 ms
bone_tutorial.jpg
608 ms
bone_fin.png
525 ms
button-only.gif
530 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
53 ms
google_top_exp.js
52 ms
gradients_light.png
52 ms
body_gradient_tile_light.png
48 ms
navbar.g
47 ms
blank.html
9 ms
icons_peach.png
122 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
91 ms
arrows-light.png
137 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
106 ms
fastbutton
131 ms
fastbutton
198 ms
fastbutton
201 ms
fastbutton
192 ms
fastbutton
186 ms
fastbutton
183 ms
fastbutton
187 ms
70 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
82 ms
like.php
380 ms
clear.gif
55 ms
like.php
475 ms
like.php
514 ms
like.php
551 ms
like.php
515 ms
like.php
542 ms
like.php
540 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
132 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
128 ms
fastbutton
277 ms
319 ms
318 ms
277 ms
316 ms
315 ms
315 ms
446 ms
postmessageRelay
151 ms
default+ja.css
11 ms
default+ja.I.js
17 ms
rs=AGLTcCNM-48YL59d_yswpJ-6bM96iifCIg
91 ms
async-ads.js
189 ms
small-logo.png
184 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
111 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
155 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
148 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
157 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
154 ms
postmessageRelay
102 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
105 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
62 ms
reset.css
49 ms
entry-button.css
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
button-counter.gif
24 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
556 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
618 ms
jot.html
2 ms
306752634-lightbox_bundle.css
2 ms
2586266243-lbx__ja.js
11 ms
blog.metaseq.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
blog.metaseq.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
blog.metaseq.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.metaseq.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Blog.metaseq.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.metaseq.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Blog Metaseq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: