Tools & Wizards About Us
machineryreview.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

machineryreview.net

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

852 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

machineryreview.net screenshot

About Website

Visit machineryreview.net now to see the best up-to-date Machineryreview content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about machineryreview.net

Tired of buying machinery for your business only to have it breakdown after a few uses? We've got the solution for you! Machinery Review is a blog that is

Visit machineryreview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Machineryreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 852 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

machineryreview.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.machineryreview.net

852 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

85 ms

dashicons.min.css

105 ms

thickbox.css

46 ms

layout.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Machineryreview.net, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) belongs to the original domain Machineryreview.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 324.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

586.1 kB

After Optimization

262.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Machineryreview.net main page is 586.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 244.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 154.3 kB
  • After minification 149.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Machineryreview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 104.3 kB

  • Original 155.7 kB
  • After minification 153.1 kB
  • After compression 51.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 190.9 kB

  • Original 244.5 kB
  • After minification 186.5 kB
  • After compression 53.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Machineryreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Machineryreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.machineryreview.net

www.machineryreview.net

852 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

85 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

105 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

46 ms

layout.css

layout.css

64 ms

arpw-frontend.css

arpw-frontend.css

51 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

180 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

106 ms

style.css

style.css

171 ms

css

css

23 ms

www.machineryreview.net

www.machineryreview.net

883 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

184 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

120 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

142 ms

jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js

jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js

146 ms

tinynav.js

tinynav.js

163 ms

functions.js

functions.js

167 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

171 ms

ajaxLoop.js

ajaxLoop.js

176 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

180 ms

606D05B0B71744B08908BD80234AF053.jpg

606D05B0B71744B08908BD80234AF053.jpg

184 ms

srpthumb-p71-100x100-no.png

srpthumb-p71-100x100-no.png

173 ms

srpthumb-p64-100x100-no.png

srpthumb-p64-100x100-no.png

151 ms

screenshot-docs.google.com-2015-06-30-12-52-01-75x75.png

screenshot-docs.google.com-2015-06-30-12-52-01-75x75.png

111 ms

0111502001390555354l-75x75.jpg

0111502001390555354l-75x75.jpg

76 ms

no-thumb.png

no-thumb.png

77 ms

all.js

all.js

268 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

13 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

13 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

6 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

13 ms

y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZiwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf

y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZiwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf

11 ms

138 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

210 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

416 ms

SEO Factors

machineryreview.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Machineryreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Machineryreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

machineryreview.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Machineryreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: