1.4 sec in total
138 ms
979 ms
248 ms
Visit magicgate.com now to see the best up-to-date Magicgate content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about magicgate.com
Multimedia, software and web development
Visit magicgate.comWe analyzed Magicgate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
magicgate.com performance score
138 ms
24 ms
70 ms
70 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Magicgate.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (442 ms) belongs to the original domain Magicgate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 130.0 kB (23%)
562.0 kB
432.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Magicgate.com main page is 562.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 403.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magicgate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magicgate.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (37%)
51
32
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magicgate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
magicgate.com
138 ms
css
24 ms
bebas.css
70 ms
facebox.css
70 ms
main.css
71 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
244 ms
jquery.myHint.js
72 ms
jquery.vAlign.js
72 ms
jquery.countdown-1.0.js
138 ms
jquery.dateFormat-1.0.js
136 ms
jquery.timers.js
138 ms
jquery.socialCount.js
139 ms
jquery.vticker-min.js
139 ms
jquery.facebookCount.js
205 ms
jquery.facebox.js
206 ms
scriptsData.php
207 ms
customUI.js
209 ms
tweets.js
207 ms
counter.js
272 ms
social.js
271 ms
ajax.js
274 ms
main.js
276 ms
clear.css
213 ms
bg.jpg
106 ms
EAqh528fFdbUek8UOky4sA.woff
74 ms
skipkimpel.json
80 ms
skipkimpel1
90 ms
ajax-document-loader.gif
85 ms
top_line.png
85 ms
top_bg_blank.jpg
330 ms
logo.png
119 ms
twitter_top.png
84 ms
facebook_top.png
99 ms
rocket.png
255 ms
countdown_bg.png
151 ms
countdown_bg_separator.png
154 ms
to_launch.png
166 ms
subscribe_contact_bg.png
189 ms
buttons_background.png
253 ms
subscribe.png
256 ms
contactus.png
234 ms
image_01.png
291 ms
image_02.png
301 ms
image_03.png
320 ms
tooltip.png
321 ms
big_separator.png
325 ms
horisontal_separator.png
363 ms
twitter_bg.png
370 ms
footer_bg.png
389 ms
footer_separator.png
387 ms
subscribe_to_be_notified.png
393 ms
closelabel.png
393 ms
fill_the_forms.png
429 ms
loading.gif
435 ms
skipkimpel.json
99 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
442 ms
MG9KbUZFchDs94Tbv9U-pT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
5 ms
uDssvmXgp7Nj3i336k_dSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
magicgate.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magicgate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Magicgate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
magicgate.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Magicgate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: