898 ms in total
185 ms
519 ms
194 ms
Welcome to mailextractor.com homepage info - get ready to check Mailextractor best content right away, or after learning these important things about mailextractor.com
This domain may be for sale!
Visit mailextractor.comWe analyzed Mailextractor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 713 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
mailextractor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
185 ms
64 ms
21 ms
38 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mailextractor.com, 87% (33 requests) were made to Perfectdomain.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) belongs to the original domain Mailextractor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 55.6 kB (38%)
146.2 kB
90.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mailextractor.com main page is 146.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 72.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mailextractor needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 63% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailextractor.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)
32
21
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailextractor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mailextractor.com
185 ms
mailextractor.com
64 ms
bootstrap.min.css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
jssocials.css
41 ms
jssocials-theme-flat.css
42 ms
swiper.css
43 ms
style.css
58 ms
custom.css
47 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
26 ms
logo.svg
38 ms
dn_icon.svg
50 ms
menu-icon.svg
79 ms
Shape10-min.svg
87 ms
placeholder.jpg
80 ms
noun_bulb_950363.svg
84 ms
stars-4.5.svg
82 ms
heart2.svg
91 ms
heart.svg
94 ms
angle-down.svg
88 ms
payment-option-paypal.png
87 ms
payment-option-visa.png
91 ms
payment-option-american.png
93 ms
payment-option-master.png
96 ms
payment-option-wire.png
97 ms
payment-option-bitcoin.png
99 ms
partner-godaddy-sized.png
99 ms
loading.gif
97 ms
Path8138.svg
100 ms
Group589.svg
104 ms
Group828.svg
103 ms
Group829.svg
108 ms
gtm.js
103 ms
api.js
103 ms
Roboto-Medium.ttf
39 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
37 ms
Roboto-Bold.ttf
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
13 ms
mailextractor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mailextractor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mailextractor.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailextractor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailextractor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mailextractor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mailextractor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: