Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

manictackleproject.com

Fly Fishing New Zealand & Australia | Manic Tackle Project

Page Load Speed

20 sec in total

First Response

765 ms

Resources Loaded

18.8 sec

Page Rendered

492 ms

manictackleproject.com screenshot

About Website

Visit manictackleproject.com now to see the best up-to-date Manic Tackle Project content for New Zealand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about manictackleproject.com

Manic has the best fly fishing brands and how to content in New Zealand and Australia. Simms Fly Fishing, Scott Fly Fishing Rods, Airflo, Lamson, Abel, Manic Fly Collection.

Visit manictackleproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Manictackleproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 765 ms and then it took 19.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

manictackleproject.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

manictackleproject.com

765 ms

index.cfm

789 ms

www.manictackleproject.com

1299 ms

font-awesome.min.css

233 ms

site.css

2148 ms

Our browser made a total of 189 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Manictackleproject.com, 13% (24 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Manictackleproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Manictackleproject.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 219.1 kB

  • Original 271.8 kB
  • After minification 253.1 kB
  • After compression 52.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 219.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 868.0 kB
  • After minification 820.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Manic Tackle Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 889.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 406.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 889.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 217.8 kB

  • Original 267.3 kB
  • After minification 261.8 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Manictackleproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (53%)

Requests Now

182

After Optimization

85

The browser has sent 182 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Manic Tackle Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

manictackleproject.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

manictackleproject.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

manictackleproject.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Manictackleproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Manictackleproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Manic Tackle Project. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: