Tools & Wizards About Us
manualtesting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

manualtesting.com

NameBright - Domain Expired

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

541 ms

manualtesting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Manualtesting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about manualtesting.com

Manual testing is here to stay! 100% automation is not normally achievable, you still have to get there from a manual test start. Read on to learn more about manual testing.

Visit manualtesting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Manualtesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

manualtesting.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

manualtesting.com

111 ms

1995 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

235 ms

bbpress.css

240 ms

style.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Manualtesting.com, 53% (32 requests) were made to Origsoft.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to App.chatnox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Origsoft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 844.9 kB (68%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

402.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Manualtesting.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 653.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 71.0 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 105.3 kB
  • After minification 85.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Manualtesting needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 424.0 kB

  • Original 653.4 kB
  • After minification 634.2 kB
  • After compression 229.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 345.6 kB

  • Original 417.5 kB
  • After minification 406.3 kB
  • After compression 71.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Manualtesting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 345.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (56%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Manualtesting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

manualtesting.com

manualtesting.com

111 ms

1995 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

235 ms

bbpress.css

bbpress.css

240 ms

style.css

style.css

165 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

243 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

561 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

396 ms

modenizr_custom.js

modenizr_custom.js

394 ms

editor.js

editor.js

167 ms

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

215 ms

front_end_scripts.min.js

front_end_scripts.min.js

464 ms

chatnox.js

chatnox.js

309 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

364 ms

top_nav_bg.png

top_nav_bg.png

83 ms

flag_icon_uk.png

flag_icon_uk.png

157 ms

flag_icon_usa.png

flag_icon_usa.png

157 ms

large_logo.png

large_logo.png

163 ms

mobile_logo.png

mobile_logo.png

161 ms

house_icon.png

house_icon.png

340 ms

blue_pattern_bg.jpg

blue_pattern_bg.jpg

342 ms

large_search_submit_bg.png

large_search_submit_bg.png

349 ms

cost_saving_calculator.png

cost_saving_calculator.png

426 ms

pdf_icon_large.png

pdf_icon_large.png

350 ms

social_footer_bg.jpg

social_footer_bg.jpg

349 ms

social_column_bg.png

social_column_bg.png

406 ms

retail-week-award-logo-1.png

retail-week-award-logo-1.png

510 ms

innovator-awards-small.png

innovator-awards-small.png

483 ms

OvertonRFClogo-300x153.jpg

OvertonRFClogo-300x153.jpg

660 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

639 ms

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf

7 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf

13 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

202 ms

chat.js

chat.js

201 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

521 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

239 ms

chat.js

chat.js

153 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

30 ms

8830007

8830007

195 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

44 ms

u6BjH9nsmkc

u6BjH9nsmkc

66 ms

ZQ5TfSuDtG8

ZQ5TfSuDtG8

76 ms

217 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

30 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

53 ms

base.js

base.js

70 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

56 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

65 ms

metro.css

metro.css

80 ms

metro.js

metro.js

130 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

28 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

37 ms

print.css

print.css

171 ms

attach.png

attach.png

13 ms

8830007

8830007

147 ms

8830007

8830007

141 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

25 ms

Accessibility Review

manualtesting.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

manualtesting.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

manualtesting.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Manualtesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Manualtesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

manualtesting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Manualtesting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: