3.5 sec in total
222 ms
2.9 sec
385 ms
Visit marbedom.com now to see the best up-to-date Marbedom content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about marbedom.com
Visit marbedom.comWe analyzed Marbedom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
marbedom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value4,950 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.432
22/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
222 ms
193 ms
16 ms
245 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Marbedom.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Marbedom.inmo.cloud and 5% (4 requests) were made to Template-1-menu-1.inmo.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Marbedom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 489.8 kB (20%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Marbedom.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Marbedom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marbedom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (69%)
68
21
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marbedom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
marbedom.com
222 ms
Defaults.css
193 ms
selectize.css
16 ms
35845591f233241191b91215816cfcf3.css
245 ms
68a071fa3dd7ec7a48dcf3987b987962.css
251 ms
f8b0f6dcf79f46c09aa2aa35b77c2d8c.css
335 ms
d0998ed88fdccea8b87af107ae545a61.css
167 ms
d6b22bd5038f49c726dbaa3d128c9512.css
163 ms
jquery.js
257 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
314 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
398 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
395 ms
inmo.cloud
194 ms
selectize.js
10 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
482 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
415 ms
core.min.js
463 ms
widget.min.js
480 ms
mouse.min.js
549 ms
resizable.min.js
553 ms
draggable.min.js
568 ms
button.min.js
613 ms
position.min.js
640 ms
dialog.min.js
640 ms
wpdialog.min.js
708 ms
jquery.form.min.js
707 ms
scripts.js
725 ms
scripts.min.js
835 ms
bootstrap.min.js
791 ms
comment-reply.min.js
803 ms
prettify.js
858 ms
photoswipe.js
868 ms
klass.min.js
877 ms
code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js
957 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
954 ms
wp-embed.min.js
985 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1011 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1029 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
1037 ms
custom.min.js
1104 ms
mb-YTPlayer.min.js
1113 ms
style.css
902 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
Logo-2014-1.0-marbedom-new-11.png
293 ms
bg-trans-light-50.png
285 ms
rss.png
286 ms
es.png
286 ms
gb.png
287 ms
2015-05-21-Salon-villa-7.jpg
672 ms
2015-05-21-Vista-desde-el-golf-villa-171.jpg
671 ms
2015-05-21-vista-desde-la-piscina-villa-17.jpg
678 ms
h1.jpg
671 ms
default-3.gif
623 ms
20160317012402826_ShowImageXML.jpg
470 ms
20160317012400342_ShowImageXML.jpg
666 ms
20160312012904480_ShowImageXML.jpg
596 ms
icomoon.ttf
171 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
218 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
214 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
211 ms
nueva_andalucia1.jpg
401 ms
iframe_api
109 ms
www-widgetapi.js
19 ms
loader.gif
246 ms
n9KZGELKVis
59 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
10 ms
www-embed-player.js
35 ms
base.js
61 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
39 ms
ad_status.js
33 ms
nueva_andalucia.jpg
588 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
47 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
47 ms
lazyload.1.0.4.min.js
153 ms
marbedom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
marbedom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
marbedom.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marbedom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Marbedom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
marbedom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marbedom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: