2.9 sec in total
519 ms
2.1 sec
288 ms
Welcome to marketingbump.com homepage info - get ready to check Marketingbump best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about marketingbump.com
Free Consult Free Quote Wanna get our take on an ad, sales letter, website, flyer, radio script – any marketing whatsoever – even thou
Visit marketingbump.comWe analyzed Marketingbump.com page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
marketingbump.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value23.1 s
1/100
10%
519 ms
75 ms
108 ms
112 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Marketingbump.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Marketingbump.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (64%)
2.2 MB
776.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Marketingbump.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 881.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Marketingbump needs image optimization as it can save up to 881.6 kB or 61% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 351.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 351.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketingbump.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (55%)
62
28
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marketingbump. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.marketingbump.com
519 ms
reset.css
75 ms
style.css
108 ms
structure.css
112 ms
jquery.lightbox.css
105 ms
jquery.min.js
157 ms
jwplayer.js
102 ms
lightbox.css
118 ms
widget.css
182 ms
formidablepro.css
183 ms
public.css
189 ms
style.css.php
208 ms
styles.css
204 ms
main.min.css
240 ms
jquery.js
289 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
257 ms
jwplayer.js
240 ms
lightbox.js
275 ms
flowplayer-3.2.6.min.js
283 ms
flowplayer.ipad-3.2.2.min.js
283 ms
swfobject.js
305 ms
ajax.js
316 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
352 ms
plusone.js
85 ms
core.min.js
350 ms
widget.min.js
373 ms
tabs.min.js
356 ms
pinit.js
71 ms
comment-reply.min.js
368 ms
jquery.form.min.js
382 ms
scripts.js
394 ms
wp-embed.min.js
425 ms
css
24 ms
bgnewg.png
818 ms
popreset.css
284 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
88 ms
ga.js
79 ms
displays.htm
99 ms
logobig.png
102 ms
gg_none.png
506 ms
popup.png
99 ms
phone.png
99 ms
image2.png
98 ms
Siimon.jpg
364 ms
logorotate.gif
365 ms
consult.png
365 ms
quote.png
366 ms
results.png
367 ms
team.png
368 ms
guara.png
366 ms
mblitz.png
386 ms
strategy.png
393 ms
brainstorm.png
394 ms
guarantee-graphic.png
390 ms
warren_buffett.png
391 ms
graciea_about.jpg
431 ms
__utm.gif
282 ms
bigh.png
343 ms
himage3.png
345 ms
himage1.png
344 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
245 ms
image3.png
138 ms
wait.gif
87 ms
jquery-lightbox-theme.png
88 ms
pinit_main.js
82 ms
marketingbump.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
marketingbump.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
marketingbump.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketingbump.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Marketingbump.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
marketingbump.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marketingbump. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: