6 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.8 sec
997 ms
Visit markrushworth.com now to see the best up-to-date Markrushworth content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about markrushworth.com
Digital Marketing Maverick!
Visit markrushworth.comWe analyzed Markrushworth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
markrushworth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
1284 ms
251 ms
525 ms
24 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Markrushworth.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Markrushworth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 530.0 kB (36%)
1.5 MB
949.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Markrushworth.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 769.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Markrushworth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 357.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 357.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Markrushworth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)
26
8
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Markrushworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.markrushworth.com
1284 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
251 ms
style.css
525 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
ecae-buttonskin-none.css
173 ms
style-frontend.css
171 ms
jquery.js
436 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
269 ms
watch.js
2 ms
TweenMax.min.js
264 ms
jquery.gsap.min.js
103 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
214 ms
idangerous.swiper.min.js
357 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
209 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
275 ms
jquery.history.min.js
287 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
488 ms
plugins.min.js
354 ms
scripts.min.js
369 ms
wp-embed.min.js
355 ms
m.png
128 ms
flash002.gif
124 ms
flash001-300x13.gif
127 ms
IMG_20150219_101916.jpg
1004 ms
image-1.jpeg
546 ms
preloader-for-white.gif
124 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
59 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
8 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
fontello.woff
380 ms
CGrugV3oJ92UQ-6yJivgVQ.ttf
55 ms
markrushworth.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
markrushworth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
markrushworth.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Markrushworth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Markrushworth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
markrushworth.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Markrushworth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: