Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

mart.sa

MART.SA

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

409 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

mart.sa screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mart.sa homepage info - get ready to check MART best content right away, or after learning these important things about mart.sa

MART.SA coming soon

Visit mart.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Mart.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 409 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mart.sa performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mart.sa

409 ms

mart.sa

479 ms

d8170e36b2776b823801.css

264 ms

js

73 ms

polyfill.min.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Mart.sa, 80% (48 requests) were made to C8n.mart.sa and 5% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Mart.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 405.8 kB (78%)

Content Size

518.4 kB

After Optimization

112.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Mart.sa main page is 518.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 372.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 106.5 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MART images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 278 B

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 327.1 kB

  • Original 372.0 kB
  • After minification 372.0 kB
  • After compression 44.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mart.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 327.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MART. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mart.sa accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

mart.sa best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mart.sa SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mart.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mart.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MART. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: