5 sec in total
1.7 sec
3 sec
187 ms
Welcome to material-inspection.com homepage info - get ready to check Material Inspection best content right away, or after learning these important things about material-inspection.com
Material Inspection Technology, Inc. also known as MIT, is a competitive non-desctructive testing company in the Houston area that offers Radiography (RT), Ultrasonic (UT), Liquid Dye Penetrant (LPI o...
Visit material-inspection.comWe analyzed Material-inspection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
material-inspection.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value26.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
1741 ms
102 ms
174 ms
167 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Material-inspection.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Material-inspection.com.
Page size can be reduced by 785.5 kB (39%)
2.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Material-inspection.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 905.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Material Inspection needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 493.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.4 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Material-inspection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (64%)
39
14
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Material Inspection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
material-inspection.com
1741 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
102 ms
flexslider.css
174 ms
style.css
167 ms
style.css
160 ms
layout.css
176 ms
user_style.css
185 ms
prettyPhoto.css
191 ms
jquery.js
264 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
276 ms
third-party.js
278 ms
general.js
279 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
281 ms
featured-slider.js
279 ms
testimonials.js
334 ms
zxcvbn-async.min.js
341 ms
jquery.tinysort.js
373 ms
css
27 ms
default.css
365 ms
shortcodes.css
381 ms
custom.css
363 ms
login.css
430 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
449 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
469 ms
password-strength-meter.min.js
471 ms
password_protect.js
456 ms
login.js
456 ms
logo_new.png
283 ms
slider_pic1.jpg
290 ms
slider_pic2.jpg
359 ms
slider_pic3.jpg
294 ms
slider_pic4.jpg
333 ms
slider_pic5.jpg
415 ms
slider_pic6.jpg
433 ms
hometest.jpg
364 ms
RT2-150x70.jpg
379 ms
Rotate13-150x70.jpg
428 ms
headerbackground.jpg
423 ms
quote-testimonials.png
449 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
9 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
14 ms
zxcvbn.min.js
383 ms
material-inspection.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
material-inspection.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
material-inspection.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Material-inspection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Material-inspection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
material-inspection.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Material Inspection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: