4.1 sec in total
364 ms
3.2 sec
494 ms
Click here to check amazing Maultalk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about maultalk.ru
MaulTalk - это один из самых посещаемых SEO форумов Рунета, где пользователи обсуждают вопросы поисковой оптимизации, партнерские программы и массу других аспектов бизнеса в интернете.
Visit maultalk.ruWe analyzed Maultalk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
maultalk.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
364 ms
248 ms
895 ms
341 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Maultalk.ru, 84% (61 requests) were made to Maultalk.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (895 ms) relates to the external source Maultalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 298.1 kB (48%)
625.1 kB
327.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Maultalk.ru main page is 625.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 268.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maultalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 121.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maultalk.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (62%)
65
25
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maultalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
maultalk.ru
364 ms
maultalk.com
248 ms
www.maultalk.com
895 ms
css_6.css
341 ms
responsivemobilemenu.css
238 ms
spoiler.css
237 ms
int.css
240 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
responsivemobilemenu.js
248 ms
styleswitcher.js
246 ms
iepngfix_tilebg.js
358 ms
ips_ipsclass.js
353 ms
ipb_global.js
480 ms
ips_menu.js
367 ms
ips_menu_html.js
368 ms
lang_javascript.js
454 ms
spoiler.js
719 ms
ips_xmlhttprequest.js
475 ms
ipb_global_xmlenhanced.js
492 ms
dom-drag.js
493 ms
get_code.php
223 ms
ipb_forum.js
574 ms
plusone.js
61 ms
background.gif
249 ms
logo.gif
256 ms
banner.gif
753 ms
loading_anim.gif
273 ms
close.png
351 ms
nav.gif
362 ms
exp_plus.gif
374 ms
nav_m.gif
397 ms
exp_minus.gif
466 ms
noavatar.png
744 ms
icon_1.gif
746 ms
space.gif
745 ms
icon_2.gif
747 ms
icon_3.gif
747 ms
bf_new.gif
748 ms
lastpost.gif
749 ms
bc_new.gif
749 ms
button.jpg
750 ms
button.jpg
751 ms
br_redirect.gif
752 ms
button.gif
754 ms
button.png
753 ms
button.png
779 ms
bf_readonly.gif
780 ms
user.gif
818 ms
calen.gif
820 ms
stats.gif
840 ms
rss.png
842 ms
epicenter.jpg
850 ms
newheadbg.png
497 ms
bg_left_png.png
548 ms
bg_right_new3.jpg
668 ms
bg.jpg
574 ms
corners.gif
587 ms
superheader6.png
847 ms
menu_item.gif
610 ms
index_234x30_blue.html
655 ms
tile_cat.jpg
658 ms
hit
287 ms
footer_bg_png.png
351 ms
footer_bg.jpg
384 ms
hit
129 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
css
66 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
64 ms
Uxzkqj-MIMWle-XP2pDNAA.ttf
84 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
115 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
114 ms
resp_new.css
118 ms
nomob.css
117 ms
maultalk.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
maultalk.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
maultalk.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maultalk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Maultalk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
maultalk.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Maultalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: