Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

maxrelief.us

MaxRelief – Max Relief™ Official Site: Arnica Pain Relief Cream & Spray

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

858 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

742 ms

maxrelief.us screenshot

About Website

Visit maxrelief.us now to see the best up-to-date Max Relief content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about maxrelief.us

Visit maxrelief.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Maxrelief.us page load time and found that the first response time was 858 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maxrelief.us performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,980 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

maxrelief.us

858 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

129 ms

styles.css

167 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

198 ms

woocommerce.css

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Maxrelief.us, 15% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) belongs to the original domain Maxrelief.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 463.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Maxrelief.us main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 18.1 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Max Relief images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 213.4 kB

  • Original 345.9 kB
  • After minification 339.7 kB
  • After compression 132.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 195.7 kB

  • Original 228.4 kB
  • After minification 198.8 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maxrelief.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (57%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Max Relief. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

maxrelief.us accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

maxrelief.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

maxrelief.us SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maxrelief.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maxrelief.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Max Relief. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: