Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

mdar.co

Expired - domain expired

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

596 ms

Resources Loaded

645 ms

Page Rendered

56 ms

mdar.co screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mdar.co homepage info - get ready to check Mdar best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about mdar.co

Visit mdar.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Mdar.co page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 701 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mdar.co performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mdar.co

596 ms

ww1.mdar.co

46 ms

brNMkOLaN.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mdar.co, 67% (2 requests) were made to Ww1.mdar.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (596 ms) belongs to the original domain Mdar.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.4 kB (79%)

Content Size

234.6 kB

After Optimization

48.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Mdar.co main page is 234.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 200.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 275 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 988 B
  • After compression 731 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275 B or 27% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 164.1 kB

  • Original 200.9 kB
  • After minification 199.4 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mdar.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mdar. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

mdar.co accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

mdar.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

mdar.co SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mdar.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mdar.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mdar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: