1.4 sec in total
189 ms
1.1 sec
109 ms
Welcome to medefield.com homepage info - get ready to check Medefield best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about medefield.com
Global, unparalleled online physician fieldwork.
Visit medefield.comWe analyzed Medefield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
medefield.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
189 ms
263 ms
178 ms
267 ms
180 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Medefield.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to S.clicktale.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (539 ms) belongs to the original domain Medefield.com.
Page size can be reduced by 99.5 kB (66%)
150.3 kB
50.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Medefield.com main page is 150.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 133.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medefield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (55%)
29
13
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medefield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
Home.do;jsessionid=E654359392B1F11CE421EF6BC09E4F9A
189 ms
general_new.css
263 ms
jqModal.css
178 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
267 ms
rollover.js
180 ms
util.js
178 ms
EmailValidation.js
183 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
539 ms
urchin.js
4 ms
WR9.js
131 ms
bt1-over.gif
94 ms
bt2-over.gif
90 ms
bt3-over.gif
92 ms
bt5-over.gif
90 ms
bt6-over.gif
89 ms
bt7-over.gif
89 ms
medefield_logo.gif
178 ms
home_tit.gif
178 ms
emptyAnimatedLogos.gif
179 ms
quote.gif
181 ms
cust_service.gif
186 ms
fw.gif
186 ms
disclaimer.gif
266 ms
bk_middle_lmenu.gif
183 ms
bk_top_lmenu.gif
186 ms
mline.gif
191 ms
bk_bottom_lmenu.gif
192 ms
bk_middle.gif
193 ms
menu_bg.gif
265 ms
bk_bottom.gif
179 ms
__utm.gif
2 ms
medefield.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
medefield.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
medefield.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medefield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Medefield.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
medefield.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medefield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: