Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    47% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    41% of websites

medfield.net

Medfield Public Schools

Page Load Speed

869 ms in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

697 ms

Page Rendered

87 ms

medfield.net screenshot

About Website

Visit medfield.net now to see the best up-to-date Medfield content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medfield.net

Visit medfield.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Medfield.net page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 784 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medfield.net performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value43.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.357

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medfield.net

85 ms

www.medfield.net

465 ms

base.css

19 ms

error.css

35 ms

base.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Medfield.net, 20% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) belongs to the original domain Medfield.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

134.6 kB

After Optimization

128.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Medfield.net main page is 134.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 105.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 927 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 54% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 395 B

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 105.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medfield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 57 B

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medfield.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medfield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

medfield.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

medfield.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

medfield.net SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medfield.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medfield.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medfield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: