8.2 sec in total
305 ms
7.7 sec
233 ms
Visit mediakite.com now to see the best up-to-date Mediakite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mediakite.com
Video production, Camera crew, Editing suites, NYC film permit, Insurance, aerial cinematography, LiveU, AIVision and Comrex rentals. Hire an expert.
Visit mediakite.comWe analyzed Mediakite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
mediakite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
305 ms
205 ms
309 ms
400 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Mediakite.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediakite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 113.2 kB (21%)
534.2 kB
421.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediakite.com main page is 534.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 421.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mediakite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (48%)
44
23
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediakite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mediakite.com
305 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
205 ms
settings.css
309 ms
ethos.css
400 ms
style.css
193 ms
css
25 ms
fa-icon-classes.css
352 ms
style.css
222 ms
jquery.js
564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
293 ms
x-head.min.js
359 ms
cs-head.min.js
426 ms
velocity.min.js
465 ms
moment.js
601 ms
moment-timezone.js
463 ms
scripts.js
469 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
671 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
709 ms
x-body.min.js
567 ms
comment-reply.min.js
551 ms
cs-body.min.js
739 ms
wp-embed.min.js
670 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
761 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
bg-integrity-1.png
44 ms
mediakiteweb.png
111 ms
kite-blog.png
159 ms
mediakite.png
354 ms
transparent.png
258 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
549 ms
collect
5 ms
collect
92 ms
broadcast-news.png
192 ms
doc-films.png
152 ms
corporate-commercial.png
192 ms
live-streaming.png
284 ms
tv-shows.png
286 ms
animation.png
286 ms
music-video.png
284 ms
aerial.png
288 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
315 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
323 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
349 ms
background.jpg
548 ms
loader.gif
126 ms
mediakite.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
mediakite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mediakite.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediakite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediakite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediakite.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediakite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: