Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

231 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

medibird.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Medibird content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about medibird.com

Medibird is an exclusive web portal for the healthcare industry. It helps the patients to find reliable and updated healthcare information at free of cost. Also it’s a network of healthcare providers...

Visit medibird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medibird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medibird.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.377

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medibird.com

231 ms

www.medibird.com

659 ms

bootstrap.min.css

405 ms

nivostyles.css

160 ms

app.css

357 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Medibird.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) belongs to the original domain Medibird.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 376.6 kB (52%)

Content Size

729.7 kB

After Optimization

353.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Medibird.com main page is 729.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 261.0 kB
  • After minification 246.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medibird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 145.1 kB

  • Original 204.5 kB
  • After minification 184.2 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 199.3 kB

  • Original 242.4 kB
  • After minification 222.7 kB
  • After compression 43.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medibird.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medibird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

medibird.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

medibird.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

medibird.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medibird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Medibird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Medibird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: