5.9 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.2 sec
301 ms
Visit medicalcost.com now to see the best up-to-date Medicalcost content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medicalcost.com
URAC-accredited case management, disease management & utilization management plus care navigation, virtual care, specialty solutions for cancer, maternity, diabetes & more.
Visit medicalcost.comWe analyzed Medicalcost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
medicalcost.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.296
40/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
1353 ms
134 ms
128 ms
129 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Medicalcost.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Predictiveresponse.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Medicalcost.com.
Page size can be reduced by 259.9 kB (28%)
942.7 kB
682.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Medicalcost.com main page is 942.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 635.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medicalcost images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 126.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medicalcost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)
31
18
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medicalcost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.medicalcost.com
1353 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
134 ms
rssphoto.css
128 ms
style.css
129 ms
styles.css
165 ms
jquery.js
239 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
157 ms
rssphoto.js
220 ms
trac.js
43 ms
getseal
133 ms
jquery.form.min.js
171 ms
scripts.js
187 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
201 ms
superfish.min.js
239 ms
superfish.args.min.js
253 ms
superfish.compat.min.js
254 ms
wp-embed.min.js
280 ms
ga.js
6 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
logo.png
248 ms
Mar2015slider_1.jpg
373 ms
Mar2015slider_2.jpg
425 ms
stronggirl.png
291 ms
healthcoachimage.png
301 ms
hraimage.png
243 ms
precertimage.png
371 ms
novu.png
371 ms
URACAccreditationSeal2015.png
438 ms
arrows.simple.png
348 ms
getseal
249 ms
__utm.gif
176 ms
arrow-down.png
215 ms
medicalcost.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
medicalcost.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
medicalcost.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medicalcost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medicalcost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
medicalcost.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Medicalcost. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: