Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

mensanacenter.com

Mensana Center

Page Load Speed

8.4 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

297 ms

mensanacenter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mensanacenter.com homepage info - get ready to check Mensana Center best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mensanacenter.com

Visit mensanacenter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mensanacenter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mensanacenter.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mensanacenter.com

1213 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

129 ms

jquery.selectBox.css

181 ms

fonts.css

161 ms

animations.css

170 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Mensanacenter.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mensanacenter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (28%)

Content Size

5.4 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Mensanacenter.com main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 34.4 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 621.3 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mensana Center needs image optimization as it can save up to 621.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 426.4 kB

  • Original 622.5 kB
  • After minification 614.0 kB
  • After compression 196.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 426.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 409.8 kB

  • Original 487.5 kB
  • After minification 428.6 kB
  • After compression 77.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mensanacenter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 409.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (72%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mensana Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mensanacenter.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mensanacenter.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mensanacenter.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mensanacenter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mensanacenter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mensana Center. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: