33.5 sec in total
1 sec
12.9 sec
19.5 sec
Welcome to menu.as homepage info - get ready to check Menu best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about menu.as
Scandinavian design objects and furniture since 1976
Visit menu.asWe analyzed Menu.as page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 32.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
menu.as performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.19
65/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
1002 ms
192 ms
325 ms
191 ms
456 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Menu.as, 32% (13 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 614.7 kB (16%)
3.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Menu.as main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Menu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 252.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 191.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Menu.as needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (43%)
28
16
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Menu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
menu.as
1002 ms
slick.css
192 ms
pure-min.css
325 ms
grids-responsive-min.css
191 ms
style.css
456 ms
jquery.js
455 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
289 ms
ita3hpd.js
125 ms
slick.min.js
247 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
153 ms
sticky.min.js
189 ms
jquery.nav.js
222 ms
scripts.js
246 ms
wp-embed.min.js
284 ms
analytics.js
474 ms
So-Me7-1920x1188.jpg
1597 ms
So-Me6-1920x1188.jpg
1557 ms
So-Me5-1920x1188.jpg
1558 ms
menu-white-160x186.png
452 ms
menu-black-160x186.png
363 ms
Untitled-11-01-360x480.png
609 ms
Untitled-1-06-360x480.png
712 ms
Untitled-1-03-360x480.png
710 ms
Untitled-1-02-360x480.png
1423 ms
Untitled-1-04-360x480.png
1422 ms
Untitled-1-05-360x480.png
1419 ms
collect
242 ms
close-24x24.svg
129 ms
i
1529 ms
i
1722 ms
i
1783 ms
i
1695 ms
i
1694 ms
i
1783 ms
i
1693 ms
i
2393 ms
i
2393 ms
i
2186 ms
i
2393 ms
i
2184 ms
p.gif
1941 ms
menu.as accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
menu.as best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
menu.as SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Menu.as can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Menu.as main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
menu.as
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Menu. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: