23.9 sec in total
1 sec
22.6 sec
294 ms
Visit mgportal.ru now to see the best up-to-date Mgportal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mgportal.ru
Только интересные темы!
Visit mgportal.ruWe analyzed Mgportal.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
mgportal.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value6.2 s
42/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
1027 ms
730 ms
721 ms
728 ms
712 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mgportal.ru, 20% (15 requests) were made to Mgportal.ru.images.1c-bitrix-cdn.ru and 16% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Informer.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 755.5 kB (61%)
1.2 MB
490.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Mgportal.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 751.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mgportal needs image optimization as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 485.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 485.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mgportal.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (54%)
70
32
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mgportal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mgportal.ru
1027 ms
common.css
730 ms
kernel_main0.css
721 ms
page_9cb5d8456d7a84c6f102dc76f5a26c000.css
728 ms
popup.min.css
712 ms
template_fb94786f347490a92af7930941ea7bc90.css
725 ms
kernel_main.js
964 ms
rsasecurity.min.js
725 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
15 ms
chosen.min.css
19 ms
template_3ca2f8e509bd79361fc7e1aae3cedda7.js
727 ms
colors.css
726 ms
openapi.js
383 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
chosen.min.css
4 ms
ba.js
225 ms
header.png
140 ms
feed-icon-16x16.gif
16795 ms
2.ru.png
288 ms
pix.gif
16770 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
19828 ms
fdfdd160e5b9b8ce6e294fc3389e2dea.jpg
16791 ms
f8bb8a9bd923a50c9c783e56ff14486c.jpg
16794 ms
291145c2f3a128841c13501f40351320.jpg
16791 ms
666e5003b8280fffc4dd24f5b8f3ed30.jpg
16792 ms
156b0be353622bb8190a16280765bbba.jpg
16793 ms
72605e38af28bd4cc42330b33c34e60f.jpg
16794 ms
44925da7fd427af791d591854d4f635f.jpg
16794 ms
fe6dc6be0ad94ae737c534446e634c74.jpg
16797 ms
e71cb4c5e26c2bbd19c1cf27d633669f.jpg
16796 ms
f7dc7807484f10b4963eaf339f1da4f0.jpg
16795 ms
a6ce0ceb95c54ac7b8c176268c4c1738.jpg
16795 ms
23cb2e40d369c9d89b6ba4256d324e1b.jpg
16797 ms
83edba50c70bd4a874a5c2cf1bc69f4b.jpg
16797 ms
2d2761be5299e99f076033611cc793d8.png
16798 ms
pluso-like.js
16756 ms
chosen.min.css
26 ms
upload.gif
179 ms
widget_community.php
288 ms
ca-pub-8312044157751620.js
170 ms
zrt_lookup.html
162 ms
show_ads_impl.js
101 ms
hit
320 ms
watch.js
5 ms
ads
239 ms
osd.js
12 ms
bx_stat
16541 ms
loader_nav19239_3.js
16438 ms
lite.css
16437 ms
lite.js
16446 ms
lang3_0.js
16443 ms
widget_community.css
16443 ms
xdm.js
16444 ms
al_community.js
16443 ms
hit
16385 ms
fFQgWQQsJow.jpg
395 ms
Tn4ABi_AHus.jpg
394 ms
IJxK1UzBrL4.jpg
400 ms
tu5JZOBXiCU.jpg
388 ms
JCUFvoHeMCo.jpg
397 ms
6ysTsYnUZQE.jpg
271 ms
camera_50.png
131 ms
w_logo.png
121 ms
01.png
700 ms
process
287 ms
hit;PLUSO
258 ms
plus.png
287 ms
kb.js
292 ms
collect_pluso.js
271 ms
hit;PLUSO
131 ms
dct.js
169 ms
h.gif
142 ms
s.js
285 ms
crossd_pluso_iframe.html
142 ms
3696d9c5412d7dbcbaf1f52aba44c40f
83 ms
mgportal.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
mgportal.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mgportal.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mgportal.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mgportal.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mgportal.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mgportal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: