1.9 sec in total
155 ms
1.6 sec
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Michaelrroberts content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about michaelrroberts.com
Visit michaelrroberts.comWe analyzed Michaelrroberts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
michaelrroberts.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
155 ms
422 ms
124 ms
98 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Michaelrroberts.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 15% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (422 ms) belongs to the original domain Michaelrroberts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.0 kB (37%)
275.0 kB
172.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Michaelrroberts.com main page is 275.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 129.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Michaelrroberts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Michaelrroberts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (60%)
43
17
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Michaelrroberts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
michaelrroberts.com
155 ms
422 ms
jquery.js
124 ms
diggdigg-style.css
98 ms
style.css
89 ms
nav.css
108 ms
plugins.css
108 ms
template-style.css
114 ms
ui.tabs.css
138 ms
jquery-1.2.2.pack.js
183 ms
dropdowns.js
155 ms
ui.tabs.pack.js
154 ms
en_US
115 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
e-201611.js
28 ms
52 ms
ga.js
56 ms
42 ms
bighead.jpg
181 ms
rsbh.gif
73 ms
xd_arbiter.php
79 ms
xd_arbiter.php
132 ms
18 ms
fan.php
266 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
g.gif
15 ms
ping
20 ms
bg_leadarticle.jpg
57 ms
print.css
49 ms
410ucuAGgaJ.css
81 ms
pERLJfhzcxv.css
100 ms
FAHeNGXgPup.js
134 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
164 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
131 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
133 ms
30250_392175393363_5037538_n.jpg
156 ms
1044960_929192453861221_2004409295903966929_n.jpg
91 ms
10438313_836802883068256_8305440535967357941_n.jpg
221 ms
12729019_1740154466010270_1897873676273694705_n.jpg
154 ms
305395_117929711648514_1217995549_n.jpg
99 ms
382425_103409043202247_1067977704_n.jpg
111 ms
581502_399759223463830_1108597687_n.jpg
125 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
20 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
21 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
23 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
22 ms
michaelrroberts.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
michaelrroberts.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
michaelrroberts.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Michaelrroberts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Michaelrroberts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
michaelrroberts.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Michaelrroberts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: