2.1 sec in total
764 ms
1.1 sec
235 ms
Click here to check amazing Mifma content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mifma.org
Visit mifma.orgWe analyzed Mifma.org page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
mifma.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
764 ms
69 ms
55 ms
52 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Mifma.org, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Mifma.org.
Page size can be reduced by 487.2 kB (12%)
4.1 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Mifma.org main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mifma images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 255.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 255.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mifma.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (59%)
49
20
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mifma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mifma.org
764 ms
style.css
69 ms
modernizr.min.js
55 ms
wp-filebase.css
52 ms
fpw_styles.css
51 ms
events_manager.css
59 ms
style.css
53 ms
advanced-recent-posts-widget.css
57 ms
jquery.js
104 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
58 ms
address-geocoder.js
59 ms
js
55 ms
core.min.js
87 ms
widget.min.js
88 ms
position.min.js
88 ms
mouse.min.js
89 ms
sortable.min.js
89 ms
datepicker.min.js
155 ms
menu.min.js
91 ms
autocomplete.min.js
91 ms
resizable.min.js
152 ms
draggable.min.js
162 ms
button.min.js
160 ms
dialog.min.js
159 ms
events-manager.js
160 ms
css
24 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
jquery.cycle.lite.js
90 ms
pixel.gif
101 ms
branding.png
32 ms
raddish.jpg
150 ms
hoophouse.jpg
244 ms
vegetablestand.jpg
217 ms
scallions.jpg
246 ms
fieldday3.jpg
148 ms
thumb.php
172 ms
thumb.php
212 ms
thumb.php
212 ms
mifma-store.png
188 ms
search.png
195 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
22 ms
action-sprites.jpg
205 ms
hoophouse.jpg
215 ms
IMG_0528resize2.jpg
218 ms
IMG_4050.jpg
361 ms
script.js
197 ms
fmc.jpg
208 ms
wp-embed.min.js
173 ms
rapsGf8n-DpRu9kcmAAciA.ttf
6 ms
4A-myfZX6oDr9CtSTkTGig.ttf
15 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
301 ms
ga.js
129 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
print.css
17 ms
mifma.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mifma.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mifma.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mifma.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mifma.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mifma.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mifma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: