Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

millardcatalog.com

Millard Filters – Air, Oil, Fuel and Cabin filters catalog

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

244 ms

millardcatalog.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to millardcatalog.com homepage info - get ready to check Millard Catalog best content for Ecuador right away, or after learning these important things about millardcatalog.com

Millard Filters · Search · Applications · Shape & Dimensions

Visit millardcatalog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Millardcatalog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

millardcatalog.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

millardcatalog.com

297 ms

millardcatalog.com

402 ms

www.millardcatalog.com

294 ms

Europe

184 ms

bootstrap.min.css

292 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Millardcatalog.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Millardcatalog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 795.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Millardcatalog.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 128.8 kB

  • Original 196.0 kB
  • After minification 186.7 kB
  • After compression 67.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 79.8 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Millard Catalog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 384.5 kB

  • Original 572.9 kB
  • After minification 542.7 kB
  • After compression 188.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 202.8 kB

  • Original 234.8 kB
  • After minification 168.4 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Millardcatalog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (25%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Millard Catalog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

millardcatalog.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

millardcatalog.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

millardcatalog.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Millardcatalog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Millardcatalog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Millard Catalog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: