Tools & Wizards About Us
mindq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

mindq.com

Mental Health Assessments Powered by Science | MindQ

Page Load Speed

28 sec in total

First Response

747 ms

Resources Loaded

19.5 sec

Page Rendered

7.7 sec

mindq.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mindq.com now to see the best up-to-date MindQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mindq.com

Current wellness screenings oversimplify mental health and wellbeing. The MindQ assessment evaluates the full mental wellbeing spectrum.

Visit mindq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mindq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 747 ms and then it took 27.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mindq.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.248

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.8 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mindq.com

747 ms

chosen.css

338 ms

layout.css

339 ms

template.css

1177 ms

font-awesome.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Mindq.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.9 sec) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 690.6 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

411.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mindq.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 540.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 201.3 kB
  • After minification 199.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MindQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 209.6 kB

  • Original 325.7 kB
  • After minification 325.4 kB
  • After compression 116.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 209.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 451.0 kB

  • Original 540.5 kB
  • After minification 484.7 kB
  • After compression 89.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mindq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 451.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (76%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MindQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mindq.com

mindq.com

747 ms

chosen.css

chosen.css

338 ms

layout.css

layout.css

339 ms

template.css

template.css

1177 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

241 ms

material-icons.css

material-icons.css

173 ms

thin.css

thin.css

164 ms

css

css

874 ms

css

css

2183 ms

komento.css

komento.css

866 ms

camera.css

camera.css

2401 ms

icemegamenu.css

icemegamenu.css

1020 ms

navbar.css

navbar.css

864 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2400 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

2399 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2399 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2399 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

3548 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3583 ms

camera.min.js

camera.min.js

3938 ms

menu.js

menu.js

3582 ms

jquery.rd-navbar.js

jquery.rd-navbar.js

3582 ms

css

css

4163 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7903 ms

logo.png

logo.png

7927 ms

220484822

220484822

7932 ms

logo2.gif

logo2.gif

493 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

495 ms

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

359 ms

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

330 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

330 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

330 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

330 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1598 ms

Thin-Regular.woff

Thin-Regular.woff

1374 ms

_weQNDK6Uf40CiGFKBBUjp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

_weQNDK6Uf40CiGFKBBUjp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

2778 ms

player.js

player.js

4670 ms

player.css

player.css

3019 ms

ga.js

ga.js

4461 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

3544 ms

collect

collect

441 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

2097 ms

Accessibility Review

mindq.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mindq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mindq.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mindq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mindq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mindq.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MindQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: