Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

minibulldesign.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to minibulldesign.com homepage info - get ready to check Minibulldesign best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about minibulldesign.com

Minibulldesign Cult - We make the best ultralight alcohol stoves in the world. These stoves are used by hikers, backpackers, and campers.

Visit minibulldesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Minibulldesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

minibulldesign.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,480 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.235

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

minibulldesign.com

93 ms

home.asp

523 ms

pcHeaderFooter10.css

56 ms

pcStorefront.css

102 ms

pcBTO.css

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Minibulldesign.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Minibulldesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 355.1 kB (38%)

Content Size

945.6 kB

After Optimization

590.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Minibulldesign.com main page is 945.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 487.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 487.6 kB
  • After minification 481.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Minibulldesign images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 262.3 kB

  • Original 356.0 kB
  • After minification 333.3 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Minibulldesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Minibulldesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

minibulldesign.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

minibulldesign.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

minibulldesign.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Minibulldesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Minibulldesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Minibulldesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: