7.2 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.5 sec
180 ms
Visit miracleware.com now to see the best up-to-date Miracle Ware content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about miracleware.com
We created the original Miracle Blanket® and our line of baby products. Shop now for the best swaddle and more. Experience the difference.
Visit miracleware.comWe analyzed Miracleware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
miracleware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value3,810 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
2453 ms
251 ms
127 ms
378 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Miracleware.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Miracleware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (57%)
2.2 MB
931.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Miracleware.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 935.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miracle Ware images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 642.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 642.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 504.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miracleware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 504.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)
71
25
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miracle Ware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
miracleware.com
2453 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
251 ms
styles.css
127 ms
settings.css
378 ms
yith_wcas_ajax_search.css
127 ms
prettyPhoto.css
128 ms
jquery.selectBox.css
254 ms
style.css
314 ms
font-awesome.min.css
381 ms
js_composer.css
603 ms
font-awesome.min.css
498 ms
style.css
749 ms
visual-composer-custom.css
506 ms
visual-composer-extend.css
760 ms
woocommerce.css
690 ms
responsive.css
758 ms
skin.css
627 ms
jetpack.css
972 ms
jquery.js
1064 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
815 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1184 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1188 ms
classic-081711.css
9 ms
mc-validate.js
35 ms
photon.js
716 ms
jquery.form.min.js
842 ms
scripts.js
842 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
935 ms
woocommerce.min.js
967 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
966 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1026 ms
yith-autocomplete.min.js
1060 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1152 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.init.min.js
1091 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
1208 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.js
1150 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
total-min.js
1651 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1184 ms
js_composer_front.js
1389 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
custom-style.css
755 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
Slide-1-777-x-347.jpg
40 ms
Slide-3-777-x-347.jpg
39 ms
Slide-4-777-x-347-ED1.jpg
38 ms
telephone-icon.png
72 ms
truck-icon.png
128 ms
search-icon.png
128 ms
miracleware-logo1.jpg
129 ms
secure.jpg
190 ms
Miracle-Blanket-Transparent_ad_-small.png
192 ms
pediatric-foot.png
255 ms
as-seen.png
256 ms
facebook.png
258 ms
twitter.png
493 ms
pinterest.png
494 ms
Slide-2-777-x-347.jpg
38 ms
medi-img.jpg
35 ms
Miracleware-Slide-2.jpg
36 ms
Patterns.jpg
38 ms
cart-icon-gray.png
487 ms
nav-caret.png
487 ms
collect
27 ms
callout-background.jpg
461 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
603 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
651 ms
coloredbg.png
65 ms
bullet.png
150 ms
small_left.png
149 ms
small_right.png
150 ms
g.gif
10 ms
miracleware.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
miracleware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
miracleware.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miracleware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Miracleware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
miracleware.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Miracle Ware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: