Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

884 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

miromar.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to miromar.ru homepage info - get ready to check Miromar best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about miromar.ru

1С-Битрикс: Управление сайтом

Visit miromar.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Miromar.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 884 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

miromar.ru performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,430 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miromar.ru

884 ms

kernel_main.css

244 ms

page_56722fe45b98fd4bcad78641cab3859a.css

249 ms

template_adcbeaf2cff1a98456382211418e543b.css

251 ms

kernel_main.js

565 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Miromar.ru, 4% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 2% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Miromar.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 734.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Miromar.ru main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 81.0 kB

  • Original 102.9 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 178.7 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miromar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 403.5 kB

  • Original 536.7 kB
  • After minification 471.2 kB
  • After compression 133.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 71.4 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miromar.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (14%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

95

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miromar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

miromar.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

miromar.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

miromar.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miromar.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Miromar.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Miromar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: