Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

mitanivalve.com

エアゾールバルブ・スプレーとディスペンサーポンプ・ボトル容器の三谷バルブ

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

768 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

128 ms

mitanivalve.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mitanivalve.com homepage info - get ready to check Mitanivalve best content right away, or after learning these important things about mitanivalve.com

Mitaniウェブサイトへようこそ。このサイトはエアゾールバルブ・ディスペンサーポンプのデザイン設計から製造販売までを一貫して行う株式会社三谷バルブのオフィシャルサイトです。

Visit mitanivalve.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mitanivalve.com page load time and found that the first response time was 768 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mitanivalve.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mitanivalve.com

768 ms

gtm.js

99 ms

polyfill.min.js

203 ms

abortcontroller-polyfill-only.js

346 ms

polyfill.min.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Mitanivalve.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Mitanivalve.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 444.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Mitanivalve.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 952.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 25.2 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 952.9 kB
  • After minification 950.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mitanivalve images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 308.0 kB

  • Original 434.2 kB
  • After minification 352.2 kB
  • After compression 126.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 115.8 kB

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 101.1 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mitanivalve.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (50%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mitanivalve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mitanivalve.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mitanivalve.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mitanivalve.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mitanivalve.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mitanivalve.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mitanivalve. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: