Tools & Wizards About Us
monotypefonts.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

monotypefonts.com

All-in-One Font Manager | Unlimited Fonts | Monotype Fonts

Page Load Speed

998 ms in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

805 ms

Page Rendered

165 ms

monotypefonts.com screenshot

About Website

Visit monotypefonts.com now to see the best up-to-date Monotype Fonts content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about monotypefonts.com

A font subscription to the largest type library in the world that seamlessly brings together font prototyping, management, and licensing.

Visit monotypefonts.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Monotypefonts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 970 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

monotypefonts.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,810 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.249

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

monotypefonts.com

28 ms

www.monotype.com

147 ms

styles.css

5 ms

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

59 ms

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Monotypefonts.com, 26% (6 requests) were made to Monotype.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Match.adsrvr.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (147 ms) relates to the external source Monotype.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 564.0 kB (89%)

Content Size

636.8 kB

After Optimization

72.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Monotypefonts.com main page is 636.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 494.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 57.5 kB

  • Original 65.5 kB
  • After minification 54.4 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Monotype Fonts needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 61.8 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 461.0 kB

  • Original 494.6 kB
  • After minification 492.2 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monotypefonts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.0 kB or 93% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monotype Fonts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

monotypefonts.com

monotypefonts.com

28 ms

www.monotype.com

www.monotype.com

147 ms

styles.css

styles.css

5 ms

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

59 ms

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

87 ms

HomePage

HomePage

19 ms

select.png

select.png

69 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

64 ms

activityi;src=5076634;type=retar0;cat=retar0;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;ord=3332801079377.532

activityi;src=5076634;type=retar0;cat=retar0;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;ord=3332801079377.532

88 ms

checkbox-inactive.png

checkbox-inactive.png

25 ms

7408a6fc-f1ee-40e4-abce-996fb9d3b2bd.woff

7408a6fc-f1ee-40e4-abce-996fb9d3b2bd.woff

24 ms

020eb584-be68-4b6c-86cd-412f19e09987.woff

020eb584-be68-4b6c-86cd-412f19e09987.woff

58 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

51 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

54 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

50 ms

42 ms

generic

generic

29 ms

pixel

pixel

66 ms

google

google

14 ms

generic

generic

4 ms

generic

generic

6 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

20 ms

Accessibility Review

monotypefonts.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

monotypefonts.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

monotypefonts.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monotypefonts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Monotypefonts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

monotypefonts.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Monotype Fonts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: