Tools & Wizards About Us
montchoisy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

montchoisy.com

Mont Choisy Mauritius | montchoisy.com

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

704 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

194 ms

montchoisy.com screenshot

About Website

Visit montchoisy.com now to see the best up-to-date Mont Choisy content for Mauritius and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about montchoisy.com

Mont Choisy strives to ensure the long-term development of each of its business lines in Mauritius -Mont Choisy identity, heritage and expertise in Mauritius

Visit montchoisy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Montchoisy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 704 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

montchoisy.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,350 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.366

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

704 ms

css

25 ms

montchoisy.css

76 ms

accordion-slider.min.css

69 ms

swfobject.min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Montchoisy.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Montchoisy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Montchoisy.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 260.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mont Choisy needs image optimization as it can save up to 260.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 521.8 kB

  • Original 636.8 kB
  • After minification 377.8 kB
  • After compression 115.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 521.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 360.1 kB

  • Original 386.5 kB
  • After minification 214.1 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Montchoisy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 360.1 kB or 93% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (60%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mont Choisy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

704 ms

css

css

25 ms

montchoisy.css

montchoisy.css

76 ms

accordion-slider.min.css

accordion-slider.min.css

69 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

70 ms

custom.modernizr.js

custom.modernizr.js

69 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

186 ms

jquery.accordionSlider.js

jquery.accordionSlider.js

182 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

106 ms

foundation.dropdown.js

foundation.dropdown.js

107 ms

foundation.orbit.js

foundation.orbit.js

107 ms

foundation.topbar.js

foundation.topbar.js

108 ms

foundation.magellan.js

foundation.magellan.js

181 ms

foundation.cookie.js

foundation.cookie.js

181 ms

foundation.section.js

foundation.section.js

182 ms

foundation.tooltips.js

foundation.tooltips.js

182 ms

foundation.reveal.js

foundation.reveal.js

182 ms

foundation.joyride.js

foundation.joyride.js

182 ms

foundation.alerts.js

foundation.alerts.js

182 ms

foundation.interchange.js

foundation.interchange.js

182 ms

foundation.abide.js

foundation.abide.js

182 ms

foundation.forms.js

foundation.forms.js

218 ms

foundation.placeholder.js

foundation.placeholder.js

218 ms

foundation.clearing.js

foundation.clearing.js

219 ms

montchoisy.js

montchoisy.js

220 ms

home_1.jpg

home_1.jpg

472 ms

home_2.jpg

home_2.jpg

342 ms

home_3.jpg

home_3.jpg

363 ms

home_4.jpg

home_4.jpg

428 ms

video.png

video.png

293 ms

dc.js

dc.js

29 ms

montchoisy_assets.png

montchoisy_assets.png

199 ms

site_plan.png

site_plan.png

201 ms

building_progress.png

building_progress.png

227 ms

footer-divider.png

footer-divider.png

226 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

41 ms

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf

78 ms

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

77 ms

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

78 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

77 ms

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

78 ms

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

77 ms

Accessibility Review

montchoisy.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

montchoisy.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

montchoisy.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Montchoisy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Montchoisy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

montchoisy.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mont Choisy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: