5.5 sec in total
413 ms
4.6 sec
525 ms
Click here to check amazing Montevideoproject content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about montevideoproject.com
Visit montevideoproject.comWe analyzed Montevideoproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 413 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
montevideoproject.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.246
50/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
413 ms
243 ms
205 ms
207 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Montevideoproject.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Montevideoproject.com.
Page size can be reduced by 550.8 kB (36%)
1.5 MB
977.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Montevideoproject.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 811.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Montevideoproject images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 242.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Montevideoproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (62%)
45
17
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Montevideoproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
montevideoproject.com
413 ms
243 ms
style.css
205 ms
style.css
207 ms
nggallery.css
219 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
220 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
221 ms
minimal.css
225 ms
cforms.js
310 ms
jquery.js
610 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
324 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
435 ms
sponsors-slideshow-widget.js
331 ms
style.css
335 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
css
24 ms
screen.css
213 ms
superfish.css
231 ms
calendar.css
106 ms
trava.jpg
249 ms
bck1.jpg
625 ms
3D-mtel-logo1.png
131 ms
facebook.png
131 ms
youtube.png
132 ms
twitter.png
130 ms
instagram.png
276 ms
home-separator.png
247 ms
Montevideo-vidimo-se-27.jpg
363 ms
1-humanitarni-mec.jpg
1206 ms
poplava.jpg
957 ms
1.jpg
1275 ms
milos-bikovic-i-ivan-zekic.jpg
976 ms
sivastrelical.png
754 ms
maliseparator.png
752 ms
sivastrelicad.png
854 ms
twitseparator.png
1708 ms
follow.png
1822 ms
jostwitova.png
1935 ms
sponzori.jpg
2289 ms
cARFBihsR6Q
109 ms
ga.js
28 ms
trajanpro-regular-webfont.woff
2210 ms
pfdintextcomppro-medium-webfont.woff
2214 ms
pfdintextcomppro-regular-webfont.woff
2233 ms
pfdintextcomppro-thin-webfont.woff
2271 ms
pfdintextcomppro-bold-webfont.woff
2416 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
50 ms
www-embed-player.js
75 ms
base.js
104 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
35 ms
ad_status.js
34 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
montevideoproject.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
montevideoproject.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
montevideoproject.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Montevideoproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Serbian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Montevideoproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
montevideoproject.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Montevideoproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: