28.7 sec in total
1.7 sec
25.7 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Morff content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about morff.in
Morff International has designed range of modular kitchen and hardware solutions Zirakpur. Modular kitchen accessories Zirakpur display aesthetics, class & convenience
Visit morff.inWe analyzed Morff.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 27 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
morff.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.183
66/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
1736 ms
138 ms
98 ms
106 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Morff.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Morff.in.
Page size can be reduced by 694.6 kB (36%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Morff.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Morff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Morff.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (66%)
83
28
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Morff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.morff.in
1736 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
138 ms
layerslider.css
98 ms
at.logocarousel.css
106 ms
styles.css
101 ms
team.css
113 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.css
112 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
139 ms
woocommerce.css
148 ms
mediaBoxes.css
157 ms
style.css
164 ms
responsive.css
20192 ms
responsive-960.css
163 ms
woocommerce.css
198 ms
woocommerce-rating.css
202 ms
css
60 ms
jquery.js
328 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
191 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
283 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
240 ms
jquerytransit.js
265 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
311 ms
jquery.browser.js
292 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
389 ms
jquery.easing.js
324 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
333 ms
custom.js
354 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
398 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
370 ms
jquerytransit.js
378 ms
js_composer_front.css
399 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
410 ms
jquery.debouncedresize.js
419 ms
jquery.at.logocarousel.min.js
430 ms
jquery.form.min.js
440 ms
scripts.js
454 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
463 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
442 ms
woocommerce.min.js
444 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
433 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
432 ms
bootstrap.js
477 ms
custom.functions.js
449 ms
rotate-patch.js
456 ms
waypoints.min.js
435 ms
mediaBoxes.js
489 ms
comment-reply.min.js
448 ms
bootstrap.css
458 ms
halflings.css
456 ms
social.css
430 ms
glyphicons.css
439 ms
application.css
466 ms
color.css
495 ms
cc.css
481 ms
wp-embed.min.js
457 ms
js_composer_front.js
560 ms
ga.js
437 ms
logo.png
255 ms
slider1.jpg
807 ms
slider2.jpg
684 ms
slider_circle1.png
662 ms
slider_circle2.png
682 ms
slider_circle3.png
683 ms
first_img.jpg
681 ms
sec_img.jpg
966 ms
3rd_img.jpg
820 ms
wardrobe.jpg
1315 ms
sink.jpg
738 ms
multilayer_storage.jpg
821 ms
pro_basket.jpg
906 ms
hinges.jpg
909 ms
hanging_thumb.jpg
920 ms
door_closer.jpg
1001 ms
corner.jpg
994 ms
pro_Cooktops.jpg
1001 ms
chimney.jpg
1005 ms
pro_channel.jpg
1034 ms
pro_bin.jpg
1077 ms
pro_Aluminium.jpg
1099 ms
allieds.jpg
1102 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
198 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
541 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
541 ms
glyphicons-social-regular.woff
1008 ms
__utm.gif
411 ms
skin.css
555 ms
admin-ajax.php
1758 ms
skin.png
145 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
94 ms
morff.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
morff.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
morff.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Morff.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Morff.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
morff.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Morff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: