15.2 sec in total
1.6 sec
12.9 sec
690 ms
Welcome to mosfilter.ru homepage info - get ready to check Mosfilter best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about mosfilter.ru
- , , , . , , . .
Visit mosfilter.ruWe analyzed Mosfilter.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 13.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
mosfilter.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
1610 ms
1097 ms
1284 ms
1470 ms
1797 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Mosfilter.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Mosfilter.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 812.4 kB (29%)
2.8 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mosfilter.ru main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.1 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mosfilter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 448.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 448.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mosfilter.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 241.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (52%)
71
34
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mosfilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mosfilter.ru
1610 ms
bootstrap.css
1097 ms
dopstyle.css
1284 ms
main.css
1470 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1797 ms
reset.css
1659 ms
font-awesome.min.css
706 ms
extra.css
1979 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.css
2030 ms
slider.css
2163 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
797 ms
jcarousellite.js
2215 ms
form_send.js
2361 ms
bootstrap.min.js
3662 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
2581 ms
mootools-1.4.5.js
4026 ms
selectivizr.js
2754 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js
4163 ms
jq_exp.js
2759 ms
mt_exp.js
2940 ms
slider.js
2939 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
2943 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
3292 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
3119 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
3129 ms
compo.js
3467 ms
compo.css
3299 ms
1674 ms
body-bg.png
7261 ms
logo.png
405 ms
cart-icon.png
402 ms
logo-bg.png
410 ms
info-bg.png
404 ms
phone-icon.png
406 ms
loop-s.png
523 ms
button-bg.png
406 ms
cart-bg.png
409 ms
header-bottom-bg.png
521 ms
13792.JPG
1546 ms
13786.JPG
529 ms
13787.JPG
705 ms
13785.JPG
1129 ms
13788.JPG
1268 ms
13789.JPG
1558 ms
13790.JPG
2027 ms
13791.JPG
2421 ms
send.gif
1465 ms
13741.PNG
5612 ms
13782.JPG
5735 ms
13783.JPG
2369 ms
20764_130px.JPG
2133 ms
labels.png
2327 ms
check.png
2532 ms
198.png
2549 ms
button-cart.png
2557 ms
21727_130px.JPG
2697 ms
58.png
2717 ms
16745_130px.JPG
2726 ms
ord.png
2876 ms
85.png
2895 ms
19775_130px.JPG
2914 ms
21161_130px.JPG
3047 ms
17446_130px.JPG
3064 ms
19681_130px.JPG
3105 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
317 ms
2_1_E4E4E4FF_C4C4C4FF_0_uniques
325 ms
cKwqcaCwHG
293 ms
hit
349 ms
watch.js
273 ms
watch.js
272 ms
173.png
2919 ms
19722_130px.JPG
2930 ms
news-icon.png
2965 ms
wave-bg.png
3091 ms
compo-logo.png
3108 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
286 ms
hit
189 ms
mosfilter.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mosfilter.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mosfilter.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mosfilter.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Mosfilter.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
mosfilter.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mosfilter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: