2.3 sec in total
638 ms
1.5 sec
144 ms
Click here to check amazing Motorclick content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about motorclick.co.uk
My WordPress Blog
Visit motorclick.co.ukWe analyzed Motorclick.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 638 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
motorclick.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value5.6 s
52/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
638 ms
216 ms
24 ms
428 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Motorclick.co.uk, 10% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Motorclick.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 869.8 kB (82%)
1.1 MB
196.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Motorclick.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 624.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 959 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Motorclick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 296.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 554.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Motorclick.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 554.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)
29
5
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Motorclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
motorclick.co.uk
638 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
216 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
428 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
704 ms
shortcodes.css
234 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
158 ms
formreset.min.css
158 ms
formsmain.min.css
395 ms
readyclass.min.css
315 ms
browsers.min.css
291 ms
magnific_popup.css
311 ms
jquery.js
523 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
388 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
348 ms
idle-timer.min.js
413 ms
custom.js
419 ms
uk-cookie-consent-js.js
420 ms
custom.js
449 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
489 ms
waypoints.min.js
497 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
576 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
607 ms
wp-embed.min.js
545 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
motorclick.png
86 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
157 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
61 ms
motorclick.co.uk accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
motorclick.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
motorclick.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Motorclick.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Motorclick.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
motorclick.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Motorclick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: