Tools & Wizards About Us
multipac.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

multipac.in

LDPE Surface Protection Tape,Surface Protection Tape Manufacturer,Supplier,Exporter,India

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

multipac.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Multipac content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about multipac.in

MULTIPAC INDUSTRIES - prominent manufacturer,exporter,supplier and trader of black cotton tape,cotton insulation tape,surface protection tape,bopp tape, etc from Gujarat,India

Visit multipac.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Multipac.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

multipac.in performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.46

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

multipac.in

1273 ms

www.multipac.in

2031 ms

intlTelInput.css

33 ms

search.js

35 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Multipac.in, 33% (21 requests) were made to Tiimg.tistatic.com and 27% (17 requests) were made to Cpimg.tistatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Cpimg.tistatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Multipac.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 198.2 kB

  • Original 265.0 kB
  • After minification 257.9 kB
  • After compression 66.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Multipac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 188.6 kB
  • After minification 188.6 kB
  • After compression 182.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Multipac.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (54%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Multipac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

multipac.in

multipac.in

1273 ms

www.multipac.in

www.multipac.in

2031 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

33 ms

search.js

search.js

35 ms

jquery_ui_main.js

jquery_ui_main.js

101 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

41 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

44 ms

slick.css

slick.css

42 ms

js

js

63 ms

js

js

159 ms

js

js

183 ms

StaticPopup.css

StaticPopup.css

10 ms

StaticPopup.css

StaticPopup.css

28 ms

ga.js

ga.js

9 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

36 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

31 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

30 ms

logo_34493.gif

logo_34493.gif

265 ms

template_photo_1.jpg

template_photo_1.jpg

1128 ms

embed

embed

227 ms

tip_balloon.js

tip_balloon.js

24 ms

theme.js

theme.js

44 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

23 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

23 ms

request_a_callback.css

request_a_callback.css

22 ms

inquiry-icon.png

inquiry-icon.png

76 ms

go.png

go.png

41 ms

add-icon.png

add-icon.png

76 ms

key-icon.png

key-icon.png

77 ms

send_inq_Logo.svg

send_inq_Logo.svg

76 ms

tradeindiamember.gif

tradeindiamember.gif

78 ms

Arrow.png

Arrow.png

77 ms

template_photo_2.jpg

template_photo_2.jpg

1983 ms

template_photo_3.jpg

template_photo_3.jpg

1993 ms

template_photo_4.jpg

template_photo_4.jpg

2024 ms

Pink-Rayon-Tapes.jpg

Pink-Rayon-Tapes.jpg

1979 ms

Duct-Tape.jpg

Duct-Tape.jpg

1349 ms

Double-Side-Foam-Tape.jpg

Double-Side-Foam-Tape.jpg

1985 ms

Bopp-Tape.jpg

Bopp-Tape.jpg

1780 ms

Non-Water-Proof-Tapes.jpg

Non-Water-Proof-Tapes.jpg

2424 ms

Water-Proof-Cotton-Tape.jpg

Water-Proof-Cotton-Tape.jpg

2211 ms

Double-Sided-Tissue-Tape.jpg

Double-Sided-Tissue-Tape.jpg

2626 ms

Masking-Tape.jpg

Masking-Tape.jpg

2422 ms

Double-Sided-Cotton-Tapes.jpg

Double-Sided-Cotton-Tapes.jpg

2213 ms

Bopp-Printed-Tape.jpg

Bopp-Printed-Tape.jpg

2259 ms

Polyester-Film-Tapes.jpg

Polyester-Film-Tapes.jpg

2679 ms

Aluminium-Foil-Tape.jpg

Aluminium-Foil-Tape.jpg

2437 ms

VHB-Tape.jpeg

VHB-Tape.jpeg

2690 ms

wz_tooltip.js

wz_tooltip.js

57 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

up.png

up.png

17 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

78 ms

stemb.gif

stemb.gif

8 ms

stemt.gif

stemt.gif

8 ms

l.gif

l.gif

7 ms

lb.gif

lb.gif

6 ms

b.gif

b.gif

6 ms

rb.gif

rb.gif

8 ms

r.gif

r.gif

8 ms

rt.gif

rt.gif

9 ms

t.gif

t.gif

9 ms

lt.gif

lt.gif

8 ms

background.gif

background.gif

9 ms

js

js

52 ms

Accessibility Review

multipac.in accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

multipac.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

multipac.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Multipac.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Multipac.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

multipac.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Multipac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: