11.1 sec in total
1.8 sec
8.6 sec
720 ms
Click here to check amazing Mutum content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mutum.net
C/Mayor, s/n - 04630 Garrucha (Almería)
Visit mutum.netWe analyzed Mutum.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
mutum.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.245
51/100
15%
Value4.5 s
83/100
10%
1834 ms
165 ms
162 ms
212 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Mutum.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mutum.net.
Page size can be reduced by 709.8 kB (64%)
1.1 MB
404.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Mutum.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 605.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mutum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 430.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mutum.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (76%)
79
19
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mutum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1834 ms
wp-forecast-default.css
165 ms
estilos.css
162 ms
styles.css
212 ms
style.css
159 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
156 ms
style.css
318 ms
style.css
317 ms
style.css
331 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.css
329 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
369 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
342 ms
bootstrap.min.css
529 ms
layout.min.css
447 ms
style.css
419 ms
photoswipe.css
420 ms
form-basic.min.css
432 ms
css
107 ms
jetpack.css
532 ms
jquery.js
624 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
510 ms
wpf_update.js
531 ms
principal.js
555 ms
scripts.min.js
666 ms
wpcasa-currency.js
628 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
654 ms
widget.js
620 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.js
620 ms
spin.js
714 ms
jquery.spin.js
713 ms
js
194 ms
jquery.form.min.js
596 ms
scripts.js
602 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
126 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
744 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
838 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
751 ms
bootstrap.min.js
807 ms
prettify.js
742 ms
e-201613.js
128 ms
photoswipe.js
702 ms
klass.min.js
866 ms
code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js
1173 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
887 ms
wp-embed.min.js
821 ms
forms-api.min.js
887 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
840 ms
style.css
734 ms
logo-mutum-230x752.png
170 ms
indalo-02-e1400873917968.png
515 ms
facebook.png
90 ms
twitter.png
507 ms
google+.png
512 ms
delicious.png
512 ms
youtube.png
504 ms
bg-main-top-wrap.png
508 ms
bg-trans-light-50.png
513 ms
al-miraya-logo_ENG_640x109.jpg
531 ms
bg-dots.png
517 ms
02.gif
513 ms
wpf-NNW.png
517 ms
n2-300x167.jpg
515 ms
bg-details-beds.png
517 ms
bg-details-baths.png
528 ms
bg-details-size.png
530 ms
bg-details-car.png
528 ms
u-300x167.jpg
527 ms
p-300x167.jpg
692 ms
a-300x167.jpg
696 ms
N-300x167.jpg
699 ms
c-300x167.jpg
698 ms
n-300x167.jpg
699 ms
a-casa-playa-vera-malib%C3%BA-300x167.jpg
700 ms
14.png
712 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
431 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
725 ms
analytics.js
413 ms
widgets.js
386 ms
g.gif
125 ms
collect
110 ms
2383 ms
mutum.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
mutum.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
mutum.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mutum.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mutum.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mutum.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mutum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: