Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

mylesgsmith.com

manbetx体育下载-manbetx体育下载

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

559 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

mylesgsmith.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mylesgsmith.com homepage info - get ready to check Mylesgsmith best content right away, or after learning these important things about mylesgsmith.com

manbetx体育下载是亚洲最具规模的在线娱乐城之一,manbetx足球新闻与BBIN、AG、MG、PT、EG、XTD等游戏平台进行技术深度合作,欢迎前来试玩!

Visit mylesgsmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mylesgsmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mylesgsmith.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.479

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mylesgsmith.com

559 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

129 ms

css

77 ms

genericons.css

180 ms

style.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Mylesgsmith.com, 29% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Mylesgsmith.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 290.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Mylesgsmith.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 72.0 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mylesgsmith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 98.8 kB

  • Original 145.0 kB
  • After minification 142.9 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 124.7 kB
  • After minification 104.2 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mylesgsmith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mylesgsmith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mylesgsmith.com accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mylesgsmith.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mylesgsmith.com SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mylesgsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Mylesgsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mylesgsmith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: