Tools & Wizards About Us
mysterycustomerevaluations.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

mysterycustomerevaluations.com

Mystery Customer Evaluations - Home

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

mysterycustomerevaluations.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mysterycustomerevaluations.com homepage info - get ready to check Mystery Customer Evaluations best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about mysterycustomerevaluations.com

Mystery shopper evaluations are sales and service improvement specialist. Specialising in bespoke mystery shopping programmes. Try us free today.

Visit mysterycustomerevaluations.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mysterycustomerevaluations.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mysterycustomerevaluations.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mysterycustomerevaluations.com

1182 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

255 ms

css

25 ms

css

40 ms

css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Mysterycustomerevaluations.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mysterycustomerevaluations.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (67%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mysterycustomerevaluations.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 631.3 kB
  • After minification 607.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mystery Customer Evaluations images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 957.4 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 386.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 957.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 167.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mysterycustomerevaluations.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (83%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mystery Customer Evaluations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.mysterycustomerevaluations.com

www.mysterycustomerevaluations.com

1182 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

255 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

44 ms

styles.css

styles.css

177 ms

frontend-min.css

frontend-min.css

176 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

12 ms

settings.css

settings.css

339 ms

css

css

45 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

420 ms

style.css

style.css

293 ms

style.css

style.css

264 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

431 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

346 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

354 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

383 ms

style.css

style.css

437 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

932 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

1086 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

471 ms

aravt.css

aravt.css

678 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

675 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

524 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

808 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

775 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

1053 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

734 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

788 ms

frontend-min.js

frontend-min.js

814 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

875 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

875 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

981 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

953 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

954 ms

backbone-paginated-collection.js

backbone-paginated-collection.js

962 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1116 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1114 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1116 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1090 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1160 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1164 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1170 ms

grid.js

grid.js

1178 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1092 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1079 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

1095 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

71 ms

2014-logo-300dpi.jpg

2014-logo-300dpi.jpg

511 ms

111097582

111097582

127 ms

bgd04.png

bgd04.png

578 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf

IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf

19 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

28 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

33 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

31 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

40 ms

player.js

player.js

186 ms

player.css

player.css

167 ms

ga.js

ga.js

27 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

178 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

104 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

47 ms

495589989.webp

495589989.webp

117 ms

default-red_60x60.png

default-red_60x60.png

23 ms

Accessibility Review

mysterycustomerevaluations.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mysterycustomerevaluations.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mysterycustomerevaluations.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mysterycustomerevaluations.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mysterycustomerevaluations.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mysterycustomerevaluations.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mystery Customer Evaluations. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: