Tools & Wizards About Us
vs.miolife.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

vs.miolife.com

miolife.com

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

vs.miolife.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vs.miolife.com homepage info - get ready to check Vs Miolife best content right away, or after learning these important things about vs.miolife.com

Forsale Lander

Visit vs.miolife.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vs.miolife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vs.miolife.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vs.miolife.com

1219 ms

juniper.css

284 ms

global.js

399 ms

ext-all.css

868 ms

ext-base.js

601 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vs.miolife.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vs.miolife.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 487.3 kB (74%)

Content Size

657.1 kB

After Optimization

169.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vs.miolife.com main page is 657.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 553.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 285 B

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vs Miolife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 404.4 kB

  • Original 553.3 kB
  • After minification 552.7 kB
  • After compression 149.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 404.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.7 kB

  • Original 92.4 kB
  • After minification 86.7 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vs.miolife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vs Miolife. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

vs.miolife.com

vs.miolife.com

1219 ms

juniper.css

juniper.css

284 ms

global.js

global.js

399 ms

ext-all.css

ext-all.css

868 ms

ext-base.js

ext-base.js

601 ms

ext-all.js

ext-all.js

1214 ms

space.png

space.png

237 ms

login-part1.gif

login-part1.gif

208 ms

Accessibility Review

vs.miolife.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vs.miolife.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vs.miolife.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vs.miolife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vs.miolife.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

vs.miolife.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vs Miolife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: