Tools & Wizards About Us
naet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

naet.com

Home | NAET Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Techniques

Page Load Speed

974 ms in total

First Response

224 ms

Resources Loaded

622 ms

Page Rendered

128 ms

naet.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing NAET content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about naet.com

NAET is a natural, drug-free, non-invasive treatment to relieve allergies, addiction, anxiety, depression and many other disorders. Developed from knowledge in acupuncture, Nutrition, Chinese medicine...

Visit naet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Naet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 750 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naet.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.3

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naet.com

224 ms

landingStyles.css

132 ms

NewLandingPageBanner.jpg

316 ms

NAET_Homepage_left.jpg

456 ms

LandingPageBG.jpg

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Naet.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Naet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

147.6 kB

After Optimization

137.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Naet.com main page is 147.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 140.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 906 B, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 140.2 kB
  • After minification 134.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NAET images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 750 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NAET. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

naet.com

naet.com

224 ms

landingStyles.css

landingStyles.css

132 ms

NewLandingPageBanner.jpg

NewLandingPageBanner.jpg

316 ms

NAET_Homepage_left.jpg

NAET_Homepage_left.jpg

456 ms

LandingPageBG.jpg

LandingPageBG.jpg

140 ms

NAET_Homepage_right.jpg

NAET_Homepage_right.jpg

144 ms

Accessibility Review

naet.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

naet.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

naet.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

naet.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NAET. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: