2.4 sec in total
176 ms
2 sec
196 ms
Visit nameshield.com now to see the best up-to-date Nameshield content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nameshield.com
Premier registrar certifié ISO 27001, Nameshield sécurise vos noms de domaine stratégiques et services associés. Découvrez nos solutions.
Visit nameshield.comWe analyzed Nameshield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
nameshield.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.839
4/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
176 ms
802 ms
225 ms
326 ms
328 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Nameshield.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) belongs to the original domain Nameshield.com.
Page size can be reduced by 785.4 kB (55%)
1.4 MB
653.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Nameshield.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 684.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nameshield needs image optimization as it can save up to 229.4 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 380.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 380.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nameshield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (68%)
41
13
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nameshield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nameshield.com
176 ms
www.nameshield.com
802 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
225 ms
ultimate-tables.css
326 ms
jquery.dataTables.css
328 ms
styles.css
247 ms
font-awesome.min.css
329 ms
wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css
331 ms
font-awesome.min.css
287 ms
style.css
383 ms
css
66 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
331 ms
jquery.js
564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
404 ms
front.js
405 ms
jquery.sequence-min.js
485 ms
font-awesome.min.css
35 ms
my_style.css
403 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
483 ms
jquery.form.min.js
425 ms
scripts.js
429 ms
navigation.js
428 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
583 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
584 ms
codemirror.js
832 ms
css.js
585 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
592 ms
placeholdertext.js
592 ms
flatter.scripts.js
592 ms
sequence.scripts.js
592 ms
wp-embed.min.js
595 ms
analytics.js
69 ms
NMS_logo_RVB_group_txt_white.fw_.png
456 ms
imagedefond11.jpg
219 ms
imagedefond21.jpg
297 ms
imagedefond31.jpg
296 ms
imagedefond41.jpg
451 ms
NMS_logo_RVB_registrar_home.png
450 ms
NMS_logo_RVB_registry_home.png
451 ms
NMS_logo_RVB_services_home.png
453 ms
NMS_logo_RVB_online_home.png
451 ms
contact-bg.jpg
453 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
35 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
56 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
62 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
63 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
417 ms
collect
34 ms
nameshield.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nameshield.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nameshield.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nameshield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Nameshield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nameshield.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nameshield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: